Latest news

Fantasy fears about AI are obscuring how we already abuse machine intelligence

The obsession with fantasy fears helps hide the more mundane but also more significant problems with AI that should concern us; the kinds of problems that ensnared Reid and which could ensnare all of us. From surveillance to disinformation, we live in a world shaped by AI. A defining feature of the “new world of ambient surveillance”, the tech entrepreneur Maciej Ceglowski observed at a US Senate committee hearing, is that “we cannot opt out of it, any more than we might opt out of automobile culture by refusing to drive”. We have stumbled into a digital panopticon almost without realising it. Yet to suggest we live in a world shaped by AI is to misplace the problem. There is no machine without a human, and nor is there likely to be.

Read More »

Why AI Will Save the World – a commentary

An optimistic view of artificial intelligence (AI) and its potential to have a profound impact on our world. The author disputes the idea of AI as a dangerous force, instead presenting it as a powerful tool that will help humanity.

AI is defined as the application of mathematics and software code to teach computers how to understand, synthesize, and generate knowledge in ways similar to humans. It’s not some killer software or robots that will endanger humanity as portrayed in movies. Instead, it’s seen as a way to enhance everything we care about.

The author asserts that AI can improve a broad range of life outcomes, as human intelligence has done for millennia. AI can augment human intelligence, enhancing outcomes in fields like science, technology, medicine, energy, construction, transportation, communication, art, music, culture, philosophy, and ethics.

The post envisions a future where AI aids us in numerous ways:

  1. AI tutors could help children maximize their potential with infinite patience, compassion, knowledge, and helpfulness.
  2. AI assistants could be used in various life situations, providing guidance and support.
  3. AI can enhance the capabilities of professionals such as scientists, artists, engineers, businesspeople, doctors, caregivers, and leaders by aiding in decision-making.
  4. The economy could see accelerated productivity growth, leading to new industries, jobs, wage growth, and heightened material prosperity.
  5. AI could facilitate scientific breakthroughs, new technologies, and medicines by decoding the laws of nature.
  6. The creative arts could enter a golden age, as AI could enable artists to realize their visions faster and at a larger scale.
  7. AI could even improve warfare by helping leaders make better strategic and tactical decisions, minimizing risk, error, and unnecessary bloodshed.
  8. AI could humanize various aspects of our lives, from art to handling adversity to medical care.

The author believes that developing and proliferating AI is a moral obligation, as it could be the most important and beneficial invention of our civilization, on par with or even surpassing electricity and microchips.

Despite this optimistic view, the author acknowledges that public discourse around AI is often filled with fear and paranoia. This is attributed to a common pattern where every new technology that matters sparks a moral panic. However, the author asserts that such panic is often irrational, magnifying legitimate concerns to a level of hysteria that makes it harder to confront serious issues.

Read More »

A lawyer got ChatGPT to do his research, but he isn’t AI’s biggest fool

The article in The Guardian focuses on an incident where a lawyer, Steven A. Schwartz, used OpenAI’s language model, ChatGPT, for legal research. The case started when Roberto Mata sued the Avianca airline after allegedly sustaining an injury on a flight. When Avianca requested to dismiss the case due to the statute of limitations having expired, Schwartz, on behalf of Mata, produced a list of over half a dozen previous court cases purportedly setting precedents supporting their argument. However, it was later discovered that none of these cited decisions or legal quotations existed – they were all fabricated by ChatGPT. Schwartz, who has been practicing law in New York for three decades, had never used ChatGPT before and was unaware of the possibility that its content could be false. When he asked the AI program to verify the cases, it responded affirmatively, leading him to use the fabricated precedents in the lawsuit.

The article goes on to discuss the broader implications of AI and how humans interact with it, noting that the Mata case is an example of the current “madness about AI”. It comments on the fascination humans have with chatbots and how easily they can be misled by these “stochastic parrots” that make statistical predictions of the most likely words to append to sentences they are composing.

The article concludes by pointing out the irony in tech luminaries calling for the mitigation of risks from AI, with some even declaring it a global priority. It highlights how individuals like Sam Altman of OpenAI, Demis Hassabis of Google DeepMind, and Dario Amodi of Anthropic have advocated for regulatory intervention to manage the risks of increasingly powerful AI models.

Read More »